From: Muli Ben-Yehuda (mulix_at_nonexisting.hamakor.org.il)
Date: Sun 25 Jan 2004 - 10:30:15 IST
On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 10:21:29AM +0200, Tzafrir Cohen wrote:
> >From looking at the source I could only ssee that it means "something is
> fishy".
0 order allocation failed means the kernel couldn't allocate even one
page of memory. Unless the machines are pretty much out of memory,
that should never happen.
> In one case replacing reiserfs with ext3 made the problem go away.
> Naturally this is a drastic solution that I don't want to take.
>
> Anybody seen this lately?
Actually, yes, on lkml, unless my memory is playing tricks on me. But
I don't remember the details, sorry. Try the archives...
Which kernel is this with?
Cheers,
Muli
-- Muli Ben-Yehuda http://www.mulix.org | http://mulix.livejournal.com/ "the nucleus of linux oscillates my world" - gccbot@#offtopic
=================================================================
To unsubscribe, send mail to linux-il-request_at_linux.org.il with
the word "unsubscribe" in the message body, e.g., run the command
echo unsubscribe | mail linux-il-request_at_linux.org.il
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.7 : Sun 25 Jan 2004 - 10:46:47 IST